Balwani flagged technical flaws, lab deficiencies and other shortcomings he thought they should address.Ī government prosecutor shot back at a defense argument that Theranos Inc.'s investors share some blame for losing their money when the startup dissolved. She testified that he never tried to conceal his concerns about Theranos and her leadership. Holmes to problems he saw at the company. Holmes testified about those allegations when she was on the stand,” Mr. Balwani didn’t control what she said about Theranos to investors, board members or journalists, and that as the CEO and owner of about half the company, she had total control. Balwani to the fraud charges against her. Holmes didn’t give any testimony to connect her claims against Mr. Bostic said that the defense didn’t offer any evidence and Ms.
#Battlefield bad company 2 update 2017 how to#
In his closing, defense lawyer Kevin Downey didn’t revisit Ms Holmes’s abuse claims, attempt to tie them to the case or tell jurors how to contextualize them.
#Battlefield bad company 2 update 2017 trial#
Bostic gave the government’s rebuttal, the final word in the trial that followed the defense’s closing arguments. Bostic said.Īnother prosecutor attorney gave a similar instruction to the jury in the government’s closing arguments Thursday. Balwani in order to render a verdict in this case,” Mr. “You do not need to reach a conclusion regarding what happened between Ms. Balwani in deciding how to vote on the fraud charges, he said. Jurors don’t need to weigh whether they believe Ms. Yet no evidence connects the allegations to the charges she faces from the government, Mr. Holmes’s allegations about years of emotional and sexual abuse from Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, all of which he has denied, was a centerpiece of her testimony. “I wonder if any of you feel like that testimony makes your job more difficult or more complicated,” Mr. Holmes because of her emotional testimony cloud their decision about her guilt on 11 counts of wire fraud and conspiracy. Bostic told jurors Friday not to let any sympathy they feel for Ms. Prosecutor John Bostic addressed directly the allegations of abuse that Elizabeth Holmes made during her testimony against her former boyfriend and onetime deputy at Theranos Inc.-something the defense didn't mention in its closing arguments. Holmes on nine wire fraud and two conspiracy charges, saying she “believed she was building a technology that would change the world.”
Holmes had the intention to defraud others.ĭefense lawyer Kevin Downey urged jurors in his closing argument to acquit Ms. First, the jury has to agree beyond a reasonable doubt that Ms.
Holmes guilty of several elements beyond simply lying about Theranos’s technology. Holmes “chose to be dishonest.” For the government to secure a conviction, the jury has to find Ms.
In the government’s closing arguments, Assistant U.S. Holmes’s defense lawyers, concluded over the past two days with closing arguments meant to drive home each side’s strongest case. The eight men and four women on the jury have spent more than three months listening to evidence from the government and Ms. The nearly 40 pages of instructions, which were hammered out by lawyers for both sides and approved by the judge, outline the legal framework and details jurors need to keep in mind as they consider Ms. Holmes, the founder of blood-testing startup Theranos Inc. District Judge Edward Davila read a set of instructions meant to guide their thinking as they weigh 11 counts of fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud against Ms. They are to return to the San Jose, Calif., courthouse at 8:30 a.m. Jurors in Elizabeth Holmes’s trial were instructed to begin deliberating late Friday, after closing arguments from prosecutors and her lawyers capped the week in the monthslong trial.